75. The coordinating office may refuse to renew recognition or suspend or revoke the recognition of a home educational childcare provider if any of the following circumstances exist:(0.1) the provider fails to establish, with respect to themselves, to a person of full age living in the residence where childcare is provided, or to their assistant or their occasional replacement, that no impediment exists under Division I of Chapter VI.1 of the Act;
(0.2) the provider failed or neglected to inform the person who may apply for an investigation establishing that no impediment exists with respect to the provider in accordance with section 81.2.2 of the Act that, since the last time the provider was issued an attestation establishing that no impediment exists, the provider has been charged with or found guilty of a criminal offence related to the elements referred to in the second paragraph of section 81.2.4 of the Act;
(1) the provider has committed or authorized, consented to or participated in the commission of an offence under any of sections 2.2, 5.2, 53, 53.1, 54, 58, 86 and 95 of the Act;
(2) the provider refuses or neglects to comply with a notice of non-compliance issued by the Minister under section 65 of the Act or with an evacuation order made under section 42.0.1 of the Act;
(3) the provider has committed or authorized, consented to or participated in the commission of an offence under any of sections 54.1, 64, 65, 67, 78, 81 to 84, 87 to 108, 110 to 116 and 118 to 123;
(4) the provider no longer meets the conditions or terms for recognition under the Act or this Regulation;
(5) the health, safety or well-being of the children is endangered;
(6) the provider made a false declaration or distorted a material fact in the application for or renewal of a recognition, in a document required by the Minister or by the coordinating office, when communicating information to the Minister or to the coordinating office, or with a view to being granted a subsidy by the Minister or by the coordinating office;
(6.1) the provider acts in such a way as to falsely suggest that the childcare services the provider provides are subsidized;
(7) the provider failed to remedy non-compliance with the Act or this Regulation observed during a visit made under section 86.